Certivus vs. Xama: Which Has Better Value?
Answer-first summary
How does Certivus compare with Xama?
Certivus focuses on simple AML workflows, transparent pricing, PEP and sanctions screening, and audit-ready records for UK accounting practices. Xama is often considered for integration-led workflows, so buyers should weigh integration needs against pricing clarity, evidence exports, and staff adoption.
- Use Certivus if transparent pricing and simple practice rollout are priorities
- Consider Xama if integrations are the primary selection driver
- Compare export quality, review notes, and audit evidence before switching
Feature
Certivus
Xama
Pricing
£49/month (50 verifications) Public
Credit or check-based pricing; verify current provider pricing
Integrations
CSV import, QuickBooks (Q2)
Multiple integrations (8+)
Brand Visibility
Founder-led (growing)
Established integration-focused AML tool
Customer Support
Email + chat (4-hour response)
Email only
The Verdict
Choose Certivus if:
- •You want simple, flat-rate pricing (no credit calculations)
- •You value founder accessibility (Mehmood is active on LinkedIn)
- •You prefer all-in pricing (unlimited PEP/Sanctions)
Choose Xama if:
- •You need more integrations (they have 8+)
- •You only do 10-20 verifications/year (pay-per-check is cheaper)
Certivus vs Xama questions
Is Certivus or Xama better for accountants?
Certivus is positioned for practices that want transparent monthly pricing, simple onboarding, screening, and audit-ready evidence in one workflow. Xama may suit teams that prioritise a broader integration set, so buyers should compare current pricing, integration needs, and evidence exports.
What matters more: integrations or evidence workflow?
It depends on the practice. Integrations can reduce duplicate data entry, but AML teams also need clear risk decisions, screening evidence, audit trails, and exportable records when preparing for review.