MLRO and SAR reporting workflows

Practical resources for firms that need clear internal reporting routes and defensible MLRO decision records.

How the SAR pipeline works

Staff who know or suspect money laundering make an internal disclosure to the nominated officer. The MLRO considers it and decides whether to report to the NCA, and whether consent is needed before proceeding. The duty on individual staff comes from POCA 2002 and exists whether or not the firm has a process.

Recording decisions not to report

A decision not to submit a SAR is a decision, and it needs the same record as one to submit. Where an MLRO considered a concern and concluded no suspicion arose, that reasoning is what evidences the pipeline worked. Tipping-off constraints apply throughout and shape what can be said to the client.

How to use these guides

These guides are written for UK accountants and law firms that fall under the Money Laundering Regulations. Start with the first guide if the topic is new to you, or go straight to the one that matches the question in front of you. Each guide opens with the practical answer and then sets out the detail.

Certivus is AML compliance software for UK accountants and law firms. See what Certivus does, pricing, or go back to policies controls procedures and the full resources library.